Home
Summary
Projects
People
Data
Publications
Links

 

Coupled Human & Natural Systems

Biocomplexity II

 

Biocomplexity II Data Library

 

Landscape signatures along urban-to-rural gradients. We have conducted a preliminary analysis of available data for comparisons among the Seattle and Phoenix metropolitan regions (Table 1). The tables provide a sample of some of the data available for the BX2 projects.

 

Table 1.  Compiled Landscape Data Sets for the Seattle and Phoenix Metropolitan Regions

 

a)  Seattle, WA

Data Attributes

Land cover

Land use/Parcels

Trans-

portation

Elevation

Hydrography

Climate

Soils

Critical Areas

Human Patterns

Spatial extent

Central Puget Sound

Central Puget Sound

Central Puget Sound

Central Puget Sound

Central Puget Sound

Western WA

Western

WA

Central Puget Sound

City of Seattle, Central Puget Sound Counties

Scale/resolution

30 m

Minimum parcel size

1:24000

1:24000, 30 m

1:24000

Various

1:100k

Various,

1:24k

Various

Categorical resolution

14 classes

22 classes (LU); 30 classes (Parcel)

5 road classes

N/A

10 classes

Various

6

1; 14 layers

Various

Data source

Landsat TM, ETM

County Parcel

County, WA DOT

DEM

NED

DLG, regional updates

UW Climate Impacts Group

USDA NRCS STATSGO

Counties

WA agencies

City of Seattle, Counties, PSRC*

Years covered

1986,

1991,

1995,

1999, 2002

Year Built

1900-2000

2002, 2003

2002

2000

2005 update

Present, Future

1990’s

2002

2000, 2001, 2002, 2004

Data format

Raster

Vector Polygon (Parcel)

Line

Raster

Point, Line, Polygon

Point, “Down-scaled” Raster

Polygon

Polygon, Raster

Polygon

 

 

b)  Phoenix, AZ

 

Data Sets

Data Attributes

Land cover

Land use/Parcels

Transportation

Elevation

Hydrography

Climate

Soils

Human patterns

Spatial extent

Arizona, Maricopa, Pinal, & Santa Cruz counties, Phoenix metropolitan area, Scottsdale, Buckeye

Arizona, Phoenix metropolitan area

Arizona, Maricopa county, Phoenix, Mesa, East Valley

Arizona, Phoenix metro-politan area

Arizona, Maricopa & Pinal counties, Phoenix metropolitan area, Phoenix, Tempe, Scottsdale, Salt River

southern Arizona, Maricopa & Pinal counties, Phoenix, Chandler, Scotts-dale

Arizona, Phoenix metro-politan area

Arizona, Maricopa & Pinal counties, Phoenix metropolitan area, central Phoenix

Scale/resolution

15 m, 30 m

Minimum parcel size

1:24000

1:24000, 30 m

 

 

 

 

Categorical resolution

5, 11, 12, 13,& 31 classes

89 & 91 classes

 

13 classes

10 classes

 

 

 

Data source

Aster,Landsat

 

 

DEM, NED

 

 

 

 

Years covered

1935, 1962, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1978, 1980, 1985, 1987, 1990, 1993, 1994, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2005

1912, 1934, 1955, 1970, 1975, 1980, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 2000

2000, 2001, 2003

 

1960, 1985-2000, 1993, 1996-2000, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2005

 

1994

1980-2000, 1988, 1990, 1990-2000, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005

Data format

Point, Polygon, Raster

MultiPolygon, Point, Polygon

LineString, MultiLine String, Point, Polygon

Raster, MultiLine

LineString, Point, Polygon, Raster

Point

Polygon

LineString, Point, Polygon